|
User #157472 13 posts
Forum Regular
|
Anybody have an idea on how to get a PASS condition out of this diagnostic? I am using a Netcomm NB9W with G-node. I have been through the troubleshooting tips on the router config page and it hasn't helped. Contacted G-node, and they said don't worry about it. I know it says that if I can still browse the Web that is isn't an issue, but why does it say FAIL? It gave a PASS condition when I initially set everything up, so why not now? Confused! |
posted 2007-Mar-5, 11am AEST
|
|
User #100968 416 posts
Forum Regular
|
Is their name server pingable? If not, that would explain the fail. |
posted 2007-Mar-5, 11am AEST
|
|
User #157472 13 posts
Forum Regular
|
How would one determine if their name was 'pingable'? |
posted 2007-Mar-5, 11am AEST
|
|
User #114148 1839 posts
Whirlpool Enthusiast
|
Try pinging it. If it fails it isn't pingable. |
posted 2007-Mar-5, 12pm AEST
|
|
User #100968 416 posts
Forum Regular
|
Find out from your ISP what the IP address of their main name server is. Then: |
posted 2007-Mar-5, 1pm AEST
|
|
User #157472 13 posts
Forum Regular
|
Thanks Billy - carried out your instructions, and it did indeed return the message "Reply from 202.10.93.38: bytes = 32 time = 2ms TTL=64" four times. |
posted 2007-Mar-5, 3pm AEST
|
|
User #82569 489 posts
Forum Regular
|
I'm wondering why you would want to ping a Domain Name Server, unless you are unable to connect to the net, which would be one of the possible diagnostics you could employ. However, a fair number of Administrators would not want their Name Servers pinged, because that would mean that a denial of service attack could be launched against the server. |
posted 2007-Mar-5, 5pm AEST
|
|
User #55710 2370 posts
Whirlpool Forums Addict
|
As RealAusTech mentions, just because you can or can't ping a Domain Name Server doesn't actually mean it's working. |
posted 2007-Mar-5, 6pm AEST
|
|
User #55710 2370 posts
Whirlpool Forums Addict
|
It gave a PASS condition when I initially set everything up, so why not now? |
posted 2007-Mar-5, 7pm AEST
edited 2007-Mar-5, 7pm AEST
|